How do content gaps differ from citation gaps?

Citation gaps show where competitors are cited and you're not. Content gaps explain why—you're missing the actual content needed to earn those citations. A citation gap is the symptom ('competitors appear 12 times, we appear 0 times'). A content gap is the diagnosis ('we have no integration documentation'). The platform identifies both: which queries you're losing (citation gaps) and what content to create to win them (content gaps). Fix content gaps to close citation gaps.

Should I prioritize creating new content for gaps or optimizing existing content?

Start with optimization where you have existing content—it's faster and often delivers 60-80% of the gains with 20% of the effort. If you have a product page but competitors are cited instead, optimize structure, add FAQs, improve depth, and include structured data before creating entirely new content. Create new content only for true gaps where you have zero relevant existing material. GEO recommendations prioritize based on this: 'optimize page X' recommendations typically score higher than 'create new page Y' unless the gap is critical.

How quickly can I see results after filling a content gap?

For RAG-based platforms (Perplexity, ChatGPT Search), expect results within 2-6 weeks as crawlers index new content and retrieval systems begin citing it. For training-based LLMs, new content won't impact visibility until model retraining (months to years). Focus content gap efforts on RAG platforms first for measurable wins. Tracking reveals time-to-impact, showing typical lag between publishing gap-filling content and citation improvements per platform and content type.

Can you have content but still have a content gap?

Absolutely. Common scenarios: 1) Content exists but lacks depth (300-word blog vs. competitor's 3,000-word comprehensive guide), 2) Content is poorly structured (walls of text vs. competitor's scannable headers, bullets, tables), 3) Content lacks freshness (2019 guide vs. competitor's 2025 version), 4) Content missing key angles (you cover features, competitor covers use cases), 5) No structured data (competitors use schema). The platform identifies these 'hidden' gaps where you technically have content but it's inadequate for AI citation.

How many content gaps should I try to fill at once?

Focus on 3-5 high-priority gaps per quarter rather than trying to fill everything simultaneously. Content that fills gaps effectively requires depth, research, and proper optimization—rushing produces low-quality content that won't earn citations. Priority scoring helps identify which gaps offer the best ROI: high citation potential, reasonable creation effort, and alignment with your expertise. Fill top-priority gaps thoroughly, measure impact for 4-6 weeks, then tackle the next batch based on updated competitive analysis.

NEW v1.9: Insights Platform + Content Opportunities + Content Studio 🚀v1.9: Insights + Opportunities + Studio = 🚀

Optimization

Content Gap

Missing or insufficient content that prevents your brand from being cited in relevant AI responses.

Get Insights with AI

What is Content Gap?

A Content Gap exists when AI platforms cite competitors or generic sources instead of your brand because you lack comprehensive, authoritative content on specific topics or queries. These gaps represent missed opportunities where your expertise should position you as a citation source. Identifying and filling content gaps is fundamental to improving AI visibility—you can't be cited for content you haven't created or properly optimized.

How Qwairy Makes This Actionable

Qwairy identifies content gaps by analyzing queries where competitors are cited but your brand isn't mentioned. Get prioritized recommendations showing which missing content pieces would have the highest impact on your AI visibility.